Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Is Obama risking a world war?


By Bill Wilson


Firing a broad shot at Iran, Barack Obama on Feb. 6 issued an executive order freezing Iranian assets in the United States, including those of its central bank, enforcing provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The move comes atop a third carrier group being sent to the Persian Gulf after Iran threatened to blockade the Strait of Hormuz if the U.S. imposed more sanctions over its nuclear program.

The NDAA also authorizes Obama to implement sanctions against financial transactions for oil purchases from Iran. The move to freeze financial assets indicates that Obama is preparing to implement an oil embargo on Iran, as the current action applies to state-owned oil companies. Adding to the escalation, the European Union has already voted to impose an oil embargo against Iran.

The moves are designed to deter Iran from pursuing its nuclear program. They do not appear to be working.
Shortly after the Europeans enacted their embargo, Iranian oil minister Rostam Qasemi told reporters “We will not abandon our just nuclear course, even if we cannot sell one drop of oil.”

And in a move to dodge the sanctions, India has reportedly agreed to pay for Iranian oil with gold, with China expected to follow suit. Instead of isolating Iran, it appears the sanctions are pushing the state closer to her top trading partners.

The episode harkens back to the breakdown of U.S.-Japanese relations leading to America’s entry into World War II. Then, in July 1941, the U.S. imposed an embargo on oil shipments to Japan, which was 90 percent dependent on imports. By December, Japan had attacked the nation at Pearl Harbor, and U.S. involvement in the war was assured.
Get full story here.

Commercial Real Estate Heading For Another Bubble, Not What The Doctor Ordered!


Video by Frank McCaffrey
Get permalink here.

Sierra Club gets in bed with Chesapeake Energy for a mere $26 million

By Rebecca DiFede

As reported in the Daily Caller on Saturday, the Sierra Club received $26 million dollars in donations from Chesapeake Energy between 2007 and 2010 with a large majority of the cash coming directly from the CEO Aubrey McClendon.
Ordinarily, this wouldn’t be that big of a deal. Sure $26 million is a large sum of money, but surely it must be because the CEO really loves animals?

Wrong. It has been brought to light that the money was “donated” at a critical time when the Sierra Club had just launched their “Beyond Coal” campaign, which was an attack on coal-burning power plants. The Sierra Club was on a tight budget and was working hard to close as many power plants as possible.
And all of a sudden, up sneaks Chesapeake Energy, a very large natural gas company whose business would directly benefit from taking down their coal industry competitors. This timing was crucial to the success of the program, and the Sierra Club benefitted greatly from the supposed generosity of CEO McClendon.

By donating millions to a tree-hugger-filled Sierra Club, the energy giant had a way to all but ensure that their initiative would gain national attention.

According to Time magazine blogger Bryan Walsh, who first broke the story, this news “raises concerns about influence industry may have had on the Sierra Club’s independence and its support of natural gas in the past.”

The Sierra Club has a long history of loyal membership and an outwardly-sterling reputation for environmental policy making, so it’s quite shocking to find out that they’re so willing to sell out to an energy company to enhance their own agenda.

The revelation that the Sierra Club funded their anti-coal campaign through contributions from the now politically incorrect Chesapeake Energy is causing untold embarrassment for the sanctimonious left which has taken over the organization.

Now, they are asking whether it was it worth getting into bed with an energy company to further their anti-coal campaign?
Get full story here.

Spotting Conservatives: A Field Guide

By David Bozeman

The defining traits of conservative leadership are too varied and detailed for this limited space. But as the GOP's 2012 nominating process continues, a few pertinent points bear further examination, lest the voters be fooled by spin-meisters and charlatans.

Pertinent point #1 is that conservatism and ego don't really mix.
Now, one could well argue that without a moderate degree of ego, most ballots would be empty come election time. Still, voters must discern between candidates who want to do important things and those who want to be important people.
Speaker Newt Gingrich may well embody many traits of the former, but conservatism is wedded to a belief that traditional institutions (social mores, religion, family, the free market, etc.) are the best checks on the foibles and limitations of human nature. We, ourselves, don't really cures society's ills, our founding values do.
This talk about a "safety trampoline" (as opposed to Governor Romney's notion of a mere safety "net") bears further scrutiny. Sounds a bit grandiose for the conservative ideology most of us know. As do neighborhood boards to review amnesty applications from illegal immigrants. As does the Speaker's now infamous Post-it note to himself twenty years ago: "Gingrich -- primary mission. Advocate of civilization. Definer of civilization. Teacher of the rules of civilization."

Definer? Gingrich resembles one of his political idols, Teddy Roosevelt, who is inexplicably revered by many conservatives. Another colossal ego, his machismo and bluster are certainly a welcome contrast to the metro-sexualized, blow-dried male image of today. His admonition against hyphenated Americanism (we're either Americans or we're not, he basically said) still inspires today as much as ever, but can you say “progressive”?
Get full story here.

NFL: Kurt Warner: Eli Manning Not A Hall of Famer Yet — Agree or Disagree?!


Posted by Sabrina B. @gametimegirl

Former NFL quarterback Kurt Warner made an appearance on Arizona Sports 620 in Phoenix with Burns and Gambo and said that he doesn’t believe Giants quarterback Eli Manning is a Hall of Fame player despite the fact that he just won his second Super Bowl in four years.

Check the full story & take the poll to let us know what you think (As you would prob. guess, I disagree) after the jump…


“I fully disagree with that,”Warner said with regards to Eli being a Hall of Famer.  “You know because I know we put a lot of weight on championships, and rightfully so.  But championships are won as a team, and I’m fully convinced of that.  You never see one guy — a great player, great quarterback — carry a team through the playoffs and into a Super Bowl and win a Super Bowl that way.  I’ve never seen it.  You know even in that game [Super Bowl XLVI], it’s 21-17.  That’s the game.  There wasn’t a quarterback just up and down the field carrying the team.

“Yeah, he made the plays down the stretch, no question about it,” added Warner, who spent the 2004 season with Eli in New York.  “He’s had two great playoff runs, or his team has had two great playoff runs.  But I also look at the rest of his career.  I mean, he has an 82 . . . quarterback rating throughout his career.  You know, he’s had five of his eight seasons where he has thrown 16 interceptions or more.  His completion percentage on his career is 58 percent.  To me, those aren’t Hall of Fame numbers and by that I mean every time you step on the field you’re a game changer, you’re a difference maker.  And I don’t believe Eli Manning has been that guy until this year.  I think this year is the first time in his career when he’s become that guy.”

Warner does believe that Eli would deserve to be in the Hall of Fame if he can continue to play consistently great football for the next five seasons.  He believes Eli should be kept out of the hall because he’s been “extremely inconsistent throughout his career.”

I disagree with Warner, Eli carried the Giants this entire season and in 2007 he carried them at times when they needed him to.

With the way Eli has played in both of the Giants Super Bowl runs of late, he deserves to be in the Hall of Fame because of the adversity he’s endured with going on the road and winning tough games as well as playing under the cloud of his brother Peyton in the largest media market in the country.

Michael Vick Voted Most Hated Player in NFL


Vick caption
As Michael Vick prepares to take on the Chicago Bears tonight, he might want to use this as some last minute motivation.

According to a Forbes poll, Vick has been voted as the most hated player in the NFL by the fans. The poll showed that 60% of the people who responded to the poll either disliked, disliked somewhat, or dislike a lot the Eagles franchise quarterback.

Of course, this should come as no surprise. Vick has people who will never forgive him, even in Philadelphia. He is also a well known name, meaning that a casual NFL fan would likely think of him first.
While fans will never forgive him, chances are that he would never be voted as the most hated player in the league by current NFL players. Players around the league respect and admire him- which probably matters more to Vick.

Mo. teen described as thrill killer by prosecutors


FILE - In this Dec. 8, 2009 file photo, Alyssa Bustamante, 15, listens during a brief hearing where her attorney entered not guilty pleas on her behalf to charges of armed criminal action and first-degree murder in Cole County Circuit Court in Jefferson City, Mo. Bustamante, who admitted stabbing, strangling and slitting the throat of a young neighbor girl, wrote in her journal on the night of the killing that it was an "ahmazing" and "pretty enjoyable" experience ? then headed off to church with a laugh. The words written by Bustamante were read aloud in court Monday, Feb. 6, 2012, as part of a sentencing hearing to determine whether she should get life in prison or something less for the October 2009 murder of her neighbor, 9-year-old Elizabeth Olten, in a small town west of Jefferson City. (AP Photo/Kelley McCall, Pool, File)

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player FILE - In this Dec. 8, 2009 file photo, Alyssa Bustamante, 15, listens during a brief hearing where her attorney entered not guilty pleas on her behalf to charges of armed criminal action and first-degree murder in Cole County Circuit Court in Jefferson City, Mo. Bustamante, who admitted stabbing, strangling and slitting the throat of a young neighbor girl, wrote in her journal on the night of the killing that it was an "ahmazing" and "pretty enjoyable" experience ? then headed off to church with a laugh. The words written by Bustamante were read aloud in court Monday, Feb. 6, 2012, as part of a sentencing hearing to determine whether she should get life in prison or something less for the October 2009 murder of her neighbor, 9-year-old Elizabeth Olten, in a small town west of Jefferson City. (AP Photo/Kelley McCall, Pool, File)

Dr. Anthony Rothschild testifies before Cole County Circuit Judge Patricia Joyce on the second day of the sentencing hearing of Alyssa Bustamante, Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2012 at Cole County Circuit Court in Jefferson City, Mo. The hearing was to determine whether Bustamante should get life in prison or something less for the October 2009 murder of her neighbor, 9-year-old Elizabeth Olten, in a small town west of Jefferson City. (AP Photo/The Jefferson City News-Tribune, Jim Dyke)

In this courtroom sketch Alyssa Bustamante, left, and one of her attorneys, Donald Catlett, appear at her sentencing hearing Monday, Feb. 6, 2012 at Cole County Circuit Court in Jefferson City, Mo. The hearing was to determine whether Bustamante should get life in prison or something less for the October 2009 murder of her neighbor, 9-year-old Elizabeth Olten, in a small town west of Jefferson City. (AP Photo/The Jefferson City News-Tribune, Jim Dyke)

In this courtroom sketch, Dr. John Stone testifies at the sentencing hearing of Alyssa Bustamante, Monday, Feb. 6, 2012 at Cole County Circuit Court in Jefferson City, Mo. The hearing was to determine whether Bustamante should get life in prison or something less for the October 2009 murder of her neighbor, 9-year-old Elizabeth Olten, in a small town west of Jefferson City. (AP Photo/The Jefferson City News-Tribune, Jim Dyke)

In this courtroom sketch, Cole County Circuit Judge Patricia Joyce presides over the sentencing hearing of Alyssa Bustamante, Monday, Feb. 6, 2012 at Cole County Circuit Court in Jefferson City, Mo. The hearing was to determine whether Bustamante should get life in prison or something less for the October 2009 murder of her neighbor, 9-year-old Elizabeth Olten, in a small town west of Jefferson City. (AP Photo/The Jefferson City News-Tribune, Jim Dyke)

(AP) ? A Missouri teenager who confessed to murdering a young neighbor girl faces the possibility of life in prison when she's sentenced Wednesday morning.

Alyssa Bustamante, 18, was described by prosecutors as a thrill killer who lacked remorse and by defense attorneys as a disturbed child who deserved the chance to be set free one day.

The trial's conclusion follows days of testimony in a small courtroom in Missouri's capital city. Proceedings descended into chaos Tuesday as prosecutor Mark Richardson was making an impassioned, final plea for a lifelong sentence for Bustamante, who pleaded guilty to murdering 9-year-old Elizabeth Olten in October 2009.

Bustamante's grandmother and grandfather stormed out of the courtroom. That prompted Bustamante ? who had been staring blankly downward as Richardson recounted her crime ? to begin silently crying for the first time in her court proceedings that have spanned more than two years.

Then as Cole County Circuit Judge Pat Joyce announced that she would reveal her sentence on Wednesday, Elizabeth's grandmother interrupted and cried out from her wheelchair.

"I think Alyssa should get out of jail the same day Elizabeth gets out of the grave!" declared the grandmother, whom a prosecutor later identified as Sandy Corn.

The disorder capped what was an emotional, two-day sentencing hearing highlighted by repeated references to words Bustamante ? then age 15 ? had written in her diary on the night she strangled, slit the throat and repeatedly stabbed Elizabeth. Bustamante wrote that it was an "ahmazing" and "pretty enjoyable" experience, ending the entry by saying: "I gotta go to church now...lol."

"The motive has to be the most senseless, reprehensible that could be in humankind, and that is to take a life for a thrill," Richardson said.

Richardson recounted in the courtroom how hundreds of volunteers had searched for Elizabeth near the rural town of St. Martins as Bustamante calmly lied ? at least initially ? to investigators about the girl's whereabouts.

The prosecutor urged the judge to impose the maximum for second-degree murder ? life in prison with the possibility of parole ? and an additional 71 years in prison for armed criminal action, which he said would have matched the remaining life expectancy of Elizabeth. Richardson also urged that the sentences be served consecutively, meaning Bustamante would be an elderly woman before she ever got a chance at parole.
Bustamante's attorney, Donald Catlett, countered that the sentences should run concurrently and that the judge should take into consideration a pre-sentencing report prepared by the state Division of Probation and Parole that apparently suggests something less than a life sentence. The judge said the recommendation must remain confidential.

Catlett cited the testimony Tuesday of mental health professionals who described Bustamante as a "psychologically damaged" and "severely emotionally disturbed" child. They recounted her family's history with drug abuse, mental disorders and suicide attempts, noting her father was in prison and her mother had abandoned her ? though she was in the courtroom Tuesday for the first time. Various mental health professionals testified over the course of the two-day hearing that Bustamante suffers from a major depression disorder and displays the features of a borderline personality disorder. Some also said she shows early signs of a bipolar disorder.

Bustamante began taking the antidepressant drug Prozac after a suicide attempt on Labor Day 2007 at the start of her eighth grade year. Her dosage of the medication had been increased just two weeks before she murdered Elizabeth. Bustamante's attorneys presented evidence from a psychiatrist who testified that Prozac could have been a "major contributing factor" in the slaying ? a theory rejected by a prosecution psychiatrist who insisted there was no scientific evidence of Prozac causing homicides, or even increasing aggression.
Catlett noted that Bustamante had taken responsibility for her actions in her guilty plea last month. But he suggested the murder might have been averted if a Jefferson City mental health care facility had done a better job of treating her. Asking for leniency from the judge, Catlett said: "Mental illness can cause disastrous effects."

Each time defense attorneys elicited testimony about Bustamante's troubled childhood, prosecutors countered by asking the mental health experts to describe what Bustamante had told them about the murder.
Those mental health officials testified that Bustamante told them she dug a grave several days in advance of the killing, then used her younger sister to lure Elizabeth outside with an invitation to play. Bustamante led Elizabeth into the woods by telling her she had a surprise for her.

Bustamante sliced Elizabeth's throat ? as the child apparently tried to resist ? with a knife that had been hidden in a backpack. Bustamante also strangled Elizabeth to the point of unconsciousness, then repeatedly stabbed Elizabeth in the chest. She was buried in a shallow grave.

Associated PressSource: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2012-02-08-Missouri%20Girl%20Slain/id-11365bf7d82641f1beabf9d69dc12e32

Signs build that Iran sanctions disrupt food imports

by admin on February 8, 2012
Signs build that Iran sanctions disrupt food imports
EDITORS' NOTE: Reuters and other foreign media are subject to Iranian restrictions on their ability to film or take pictures in Tehran.  REUTERS/Morteza Nikoubazl
EDITORS’ NOTE: Reuters and other foreign media are subject to Iranian restrictions on their ability to film or take pictures in Tehran.
Credit: Reuters/Morteza Nikoubazl


By Niluksi Koswanage and Parisa Hafezi
KUALA LUMPUR/TEHRAN |
Wed Feb 8, 2012 1:28pm EST

(Reuters) – More evidence emerged of the crippling impact of new sanctions on Iran, with international traders saying Tehran is having trouble buying rice, cooking oil and other staples to feed its 74 million people weeks before an election.


New U.S. financial sanctions imposed since the beginning of this year to punish Tehran over its nuclear program are playing havoc with Iran’s ability to buy imports and receive payment for its oil exports, commodities traders said.


Iran denies that sanctions are causing serious harm to its economy, but Reuters investigations in recent days with commodities traders around the globe show serious disruptions to its imports. That is having a real impact on the streets of Iran, where prices for basic foodstuffs are soaring.


South Korean President Lee Myung-bak was in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday, the latest leader of a major Asian oil importing country to visit the Middle East seeking alternative sources of oil as sanctions make it more difficult to import from Iran.


Danish shipping and oil company A.P. Moller-Maersk on Wednesday said it had suspended the transport of new Iranian oil-related cargoes and oil tanker deals due to European Union sanctions.


Traders in Asia told Reuters on Tuesday that Malaysian exporters of palm oil – the source of half of Iran’s consumption of a food staple used to make margarine and confectionary – had halted sales to Iran because they could not get paid.


That followed news on Monday that Iran had defaulted on payments for rice from top supplier India, and news last week that Ukrainian shipments of maize had been cut nearly in half.


Rice is one of the main staples of the Iranian diet. With the rial currency plummeting, prices have more than doubled to $5 a kilo at bazaars in Iran from about $2 last year.


Maize is used primarily as animal feed, and the cost of meat has almost tripled to about $30 a kilo, beyond the budget of many middle class Iranian families.


The measures have had a dramatic impact on daily life in the country ahead of a March 2 parliamentary election that will pit supporters of hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad against opponents seen as even more conservative.


Reformists are barely represented in the election, which is being seen as a referendum on Ahmadinejad’s economic policies that have seen subsidies for basic goods cut and replaced with direct payments to families.


Next month’s election will be Iran’s first since a presidential vote in 2009, when a disputed victory for Ahmadinejad triggered eight months of violent protests. The authorities put that revolt down by force, but since then the Arab Spring has shown the vulnerability of governments in the region to popular anger fuelled by economic hardship.


PALM OIL “HALTED”

The sanctions have not shut the door on all international trade.

U.S. agribusiness giant Cargill said on Tuesday it planned to continue grain shipments to Iran, although its vice chairman Paul Conway said it was being “very careful” about how it financed its business there.

The company was still managing to find banks offering letters of credit, paid in currencies other than the dollar, Conway told Reuters.


But traders in Malaysia’s capital Kuala Lumpur said palm oil shipments to Iran had largely been halted since late last year, after U.S. and European sanctions made it difficult for buyers to obtain letters of credit and make payments via middlemen in the United Arab Emirates.


“They keep asking in the spirit of Muslim brotherhood. The last I heard was an enquiry for 5,000 tonnes for February or March delivery, but no one wants to take that risk now,” said one trader in Kuala Lumpur, speaking on condition of anonymity while discussing commercial contracts.


A margarine factory owner in Iran, who asked not to be identified, said there was a shortage in supply of the oils needed to make margarine that could halt production soon.


“The way things are going, I predict that over next three to four months our edible oil will run out because of sanctions. It is no longer being imported and Iran itself cannot produce that much.”


A Tehran market wholesaler said: “There is a big shortage of margarine in the market, due to drop in imports. What is being sold now is our previous stockpiles.”


A default by Iranian buyers on purchases of 200,000 tonnes of Indian rice is potentially more crippling. The average Iranian eats 40 kilos of rice a year, 45 percent of which is imported, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. India is the main supplier.


The president of the All India Rice Exporters’ Association said it was advising exporters to stop selling rice to Iran with the customary 90 days credit for payment.


“As part of our efforts to minimize losses, we are asking our colleagues to avoid sending rice on credit,” Vijay Setia said.


Exporters have also had difficulty in Pakistan, another of Iran’s major sources of rice.

Javed Agha, head of the Rice Exporters Association of Pakistan said: “We use lines of credit opened through agents in Dubai, but that too has become difficult because of sanctions and the resulting currency fluctuations.”


Iranian buyers normally pay for Indian rice through middlemen in the UAE, but falls in Iran’s rial means buyers have trouble covering the cost in hard currency.


HAMMER BLOW

The ultimate hammer blow to Iran’s economy could come in the next few months if it becomes unable to sell the 2.6 million barrels of oil a day that it is accustomed to exporting, or is forced to offer such steep discounts that its revenue shrivels.


While Iran has a more diverse economy than other big oil exporters in the Gulf, energy exports are still its main source of earnings to buy food and other necessities.


Top oil exporter Saudi Arabia – long a regional rival of Iran – has promised to make up for lost supply for countries that stop buying Iranian crude.


South Korea’s Lee became on Tuesday the latest Asian leader to visit Saudi Arabia in search of additional oil supplies to replace possible cuts of oil from Iran. The leaders of Japan and China visited in recent weeks.

“I believe Saudi can play a major role in stabilizing the global economy,” Lee said in a speech. Korea bought 87 percent of its oil from the Middle East last year, including 9 percent from Iran.


Where Iran is still able to sell oil, it has difficulty getting paid, or exchanging payment from the buyer’s domestic currency into dollars so that it can use the money for international trade.


South Korea owes Iran’s central bank about $5 billion for crude oil imports, but the money is trapped in the Korean banking system because of U.S. sanctions.


The European Union, which bought about a fifth of Iran’s oil exports last year, has announced a total embargo which will take force over the next six months.


China, which also bought about a fifth of Iran’s oil last year, is demanding steep discounts to keep doing business with Tehran, and has cut its imports by more than half over the first three months of this year while pressing Iran to cut its price.


A senior executive of a U.S. oil company said Saudi exports have risen by 200,000 barrels a day, mostly to Asia, making up for most of the decline in China’s imports of Iranian oil. China has also been increasing its purchases from Russia and West Africa, oil traders say.


Energy is not the only Iranian export that has been hurt. Traders said that China is likely to cut its purchases of Iranian iron ore as well, worth $2 billion a year.


“There is a huge risk ahead, and many haven’t realized it yet,” said a senior executive at a Shanghai-based trading firm that has a long-term partnership with an Iranian ore supplier.


“It is easy for the United States to freeze our business, forcing large Chinese Iran ore traders, which have large trading volumes with Iran, to be more cautious when making bookings. It’s not worth taking the risk.”

A Chinese iron ore buyer based in eastern China’s Shandong province said some of his Iranian suppliers had rushed shipments, a sign that they too were worried about potential payment problems. Shipments booked in February had arrived early, and he expected imports to decline by March.


The new U.S. sanctions, which come into effect gradually by June, would make it impossible for countries to use the international financial system to pay for Iranian oil. Washington has said it will provide waivers to countries to prevent chaos on oil markets, but wants them to demonstrate that they are cutting imports in order to receive the permits.


The sanctions have been imposed to halt Iran’s nuclear program, which the West believes is being used to develop a nuclear bomb. Iran’s leadership says the nuclear program is peaceful, and it is willing to endure sanctions to maintain it as a national right.


Last month, Iran took the important step of beginning production of highly enriched uranium at a new facility hidden deep under a mountain, where it would be difficult for U.S. or Israeli warplanes to destroy it.

Israel and Western countries have accused Iran of working to develop a nuclear bomb, a charge dismissed by Tehran.


Talks between Iran and the West over the nuclear program broke down a year ago. Iran has repeatedly said it wants to restart the talks, but has refused Western demands to make clear first that its uranium enrichment would be up for negotiation.


As the sanctions have tightened, Iranian officials have made repeated threats of military strikes against Mid-East shipping and the United States, which protects the Mid-East oil trade with a giant flotilla based in the Gulf.


(Additional reporting by Ruby Lian in Shanghai, David Stanway and Judy Hua in Beijing, Cho Mee-young in Seoul, Marwa Rashad in Riyadh, Ratanajyoti Dutta and Mayank Bhardwaj in New Delhi, Qasim Nauman in Islamabad, Alex Lawler and Jonathan Saul in London, Emma Farge and Tom Miles in Geneva and Vladimir Soldatkin in Moscow; Writing by Peter Graff; Editing by Janet McBride and Andrew Heavens)

Today's News NJ FILM REVIEW: Safe House

Posted by montoc1701


A film that stars Denzel Washington and Ryan Reynolds as opposing sides of this spy thriller action drama that ticks all the boxes but does it actually work?

One of the CIA’s top renegade spies Tobin Frost (Washington) is on the run, after a someone had tried to kill him and his British Intelligence associate, and walk straight into the US Embassy in South Africa where the CIA immediately arrest him and transfer him to a safe house for interrogation.


The safe house is manned by Matt Weston (Reynolds) who has been stationed there a year and hardly seen any action. Weston is bored but dedicated and desperately wants to move to Paris s a field agent to be with his girlfriend.

When Frost is brought to Weston’s safe house everyone seems on edge apart from Frost who seem remarkable calm and in control. Not long into the film the safe house is attacked and Weston finds himself on the run with Frost trying to stay one step ahead of the bad guys while also trying to not let Frost get away.

Why did Frost go rogue and who is after him. Is there a mole in the CIA or something bigger and who can they trust. These are the questions asked in this thriller that travels across South Africa and beyond.
There are 3 times of spy films in my book, one is the James Bond over top gadget fest that families can watch, two the slow burning complex story (Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy) and three the full on non stop action spectacle. Safe House is firmly in the last group. This film is gritty and fast and LOUD. It will appeal to fans of the Bourne films and it is a good comparison but with this it is harder and the crashes seem worse than Bourne. The Director Jorge Daniel from Sweden has done a great job with his first American movie and is trying to bring something new to the genre. He succeeds in a way but also fails in another. Another obvious comparison would be Man on Fire which also starred Washington. That was real yet gritty and tense.

The camera work is decent and the use of shaky cam is not overdone and Daniel makes good use of the locations and natural lighting. The decision to bring Ramin Djawadi for the music was a wise choice as the score uses multiple themes to enhance the mood and the more serious moments. The stunts are impressive and I thought I had seen all the ways to show a car crash on screen but somehow this film manages to show some new ways which is an accomplishment in itself. There were some genuine jump out of seat moments within the action that took me completely by surprise and the deaths are not pretty in this film. People die in nasty ways and the bad guys are just ruthless. They do not say a lot and that is because they are doing their job.

The relationship between the two lead characters Frost and Weston is a fragile one that grows in ways you would not expect and I do not mean the easy route where they become friends, this is real life action remember. The story has a few twists and turns that some you see coming and some you don’t. This is where I was disappointed because in seems every spy film these days there is a mole or a double cross but to guess it so early on was just a let down. If you are going to have a double cross then make the audience work for it and not guess it to easily. Look back at films like No Way Out for inspiration. Chessy I know but I never saw that coming in a million years.

Also this film was LOUD maybe too loud. I am all for full on action scenes but the guns shots were going for a realistic sound like you were in the action yourself. I m sure millions of people love this but then why so loud. Maybe I am getting old.

The cast are all decent enough with Denzel brining his normal committed self and defining his charter in a way only Denzel can. Reynolds is trying to prove a point here by not being the pretty face and to a degree he succeeds. Supporting the leads are Brendon Gleeson in what I would call a by decent portrayal and Sam Shepard plying the same character type as he did in Black Hawk Down which is not a complaint but I fear he will be getting typecast in these roles. Also there is one of my favourite actresses Vera Farmiga who quite frankly is wasted in this role which is a shame because she is amazing when cast right, like up in the Air and Source Code.

Overall not a bad film at all and will please the action gritty spy fans but next time work more on the plot to bring something new to the genre.

GS Rating: 3/5
GS Reporter: Montoya