Saturday, May 8, 2010

What’s the difference between Israel and North Korea? [Darleen Click]

Hey, there is none!
Neither is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), and both employ their nuclear weapons in elaborate games of peek-a-boo with the international community. Israel and North Korea are equally paranoid about outsiders conspiring to destroy their states, and this paranoia isn’t without some justification. Partly as a result of these suspicions, both countries engage in reckless and destabilizing foreign policies. In recent years, Israel has launched preemptive strikes and invaded other countries, while North Korea has abducted foreign citizens and blown up South Korean targets (including, possibly, a South Korean ship in late March in the Yellow Sea).


This kind of demagoguery is not innocently done. However, considering Obama’s barely concealed contempt for Israel, perhaps it’s not surprising to see a rise of such attempts at pernicious equivalency. Feffer certainly isn’t alone:


Is the Star of David the new swastika?
One may be excused at wondering if Obama’s latest demonstration of international impotency is borne of incompetence or design.


So much for US President Barack Obama’s famed powers of persuasion. At the UN’s Nuclear Non-Poliferation Treaty review conference which opened this week, the Obama administration managed to lose control over the agenda before the conference even started.


Obama administration officials said they intended to use the conference as a platform to mount international pressure on Iran to stop its illicit nuclear proliferation activities. But even before the conference began, with a little prodding from Egypt, the administration agreed that instead of focusing on Iran, the conference would adopt Iran’s chosen agenda: attacking Israel for its alleged nuclear arsenal.


Heck of a job, Barry!

No comments: