He appoints people to the education department that are perverts. He sucks up to homosexuals by inviting them to the White House, trying to get rid of DADT, etc. and now he’s appointed a nominee to the Supreme Court that demanded sex change operations and transvestite bathrooms at Harvard.
Chaplain Klingenschmitt has contracted with a team of investigative journalists including Brian Camenker, Amy Contrada and Peter LaBarbera to investigate and report breaking news about Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan.
While serving as Dean of Harvard Law School, Kagan’s administration demanded and forced Blue-Cross, Blue-Shield to cover sex-change operations as an “equal right” paid benefit, harming gender-confused students, as confirmed in 2006 and 2008 by Harvard Crimson newspaper articles.
Kagan also offered sympathetic ear to lesbian group Lambda’s Transgender Task Force demand to force all women to share public bathrooms and locker-rooms with cross-dressing men, which is now part of Harvard’s dormitory policy, according to the report.
“This is further proof Elena Kagan cannot be trusted to impartially rule on Obamacare or bathroom bills like ENDA, since she believes sin is a Constitutional right,” said Chaplain Klingenschmitt, “but rights come from God, who never grants the right to sin.”
The SOB is a pervert and every effort ought to be made to impeach his foul ass.
And if that weren’t enough to get your blood boiling, have you heard where Kagan thinks foreign laws can provide ideas?
Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan says foreign law could be useful “for getting good ideas” when interpreting the Constitution but that justices should not feel bound by it.
Kagan was speaking Tuesday in response to questioning by Republican Sen. Charles Grassley on the role of international law in U.S. courts, which some conservatives oppose. The Supreme Court has previously cited foreign law in deciding cases, such as when it struck down the U.S. execution of juvenile murder defendants as unconstitutional.
Kagan says that international law can be used as a guide, but it should not be considered binding when deciding Supreme Court cases because the Constitution is a unique document.
And if you believe that, you might want to recall that the other snot-hag, Sotomayor, said during her confirmation hearing how she’d defend the 2nd Amendment only to turn around and vote against it earlier this week:
When questioned about the Commerce Clause and how the Senate uses it to justify restricting our lifestyles, she hemmed and hawed:
by Vilmar
No comments:
Post a Comment