Single Black childbearing woman.
Unmarried Black woman birthing life. Queer (unwed) Black woman having or
raising a child. Spinster Black woman adopting a young soul.
Figuratively, your wombs are on my mind, along with the wombs of the
numerous other mothers who do not fit the
first-comes-marriage-then-baby-in-the-carriage narrative.
The diverse experiences of Black female motherhood remain a hot topic
in Black social commentary. Last week, an online viral campaign
entitled “No
Wedding No Womb” hit the blogosphere and Twitter community like a
2×4 appearing from the dark. Founded by relationships author and blogger
Christelyn Karazin, the “movement” sparked a ton of controversy and,
perhaps, some conversations that we, as a community, have become
lackadaisical about having. Good or bad, it is true that approximately
70% of Black children are being born out of wedlock. From the
perspective of our parent’s generation, this is astonishing, yet it is a
reality and something we ought to be discussing. Although this online
social blitzkrieg called for weddings and/or couple commitment before
having children, the questions beneath the shouting and #NWNW
Twitter bashing truly were the following:
“How do we create a healthy, cohesive environment where we can
raise our young ones?” “How can Black women get the support they need as
mothers: financially, emotionally, physically, etcetera?” “How can we
as a community deliver a strong message that warns younger Black women
that single mothering can be tough, and that waiting for a healthy
marriage, or committed relationship, could perhaps serve their futures
better?”
When I analyze a social issue, I don’t simply take things from the
surface. The title,” No Wedding, No Womb,” is salacious, but the
messaging of the 100+ bloggers who participated in the campaign were not
speaking in one voice. They were conversing, challenging each other,
and trying to promote why this was an important issue for our community
to discuss because, in truth, we’re not doing well. Full disclaimer: I
participated in the movement by critiquing its heteronormativity and I
introduced into the conversation the politics of gay marriage.
I believe that healthy marriages can be one tool by which Black women
can see social change. It’s not simply the marriage or commitment
factor, though, that can solve our social ills. The problem is that
Black women, particularly, face tough economic conditions, disheartening
long-term relationship prospects, societal sexism, homophobia, not to
mention the “Black card” that has ridden our skin since birth. There are
several other oppressions that intersect with the ones above, but the
main point is that we have the end of the stick at our feet. While we
are not victims and instead claim ourselves as warriors, we are
struggling—and healthy life partnerships could make our lives easier.
One person cannot fight everything, all the time, everyday. Man, woman,
or transgender, we need partners who want to support our life paths.
Healthy marriages can be a strong answer to that plight.
Particularly from a heterosexual perspective, Black men do need to be
brought into the conversation about our struggles. I don’t want to bash
our men, but, truthfully, they’re not pulling the same amount of weight
as we are as parents. Many of them are not there for our children:
financially, emotionally, and physically. And these are not simply men
who had children out of wedlock, this also can apply to divorced and
separated fathers who had children within heterosexual marriages. Black
women are the strong backbone of this community, married or not. We
don’t need to be replaced in that capacity, but we do need more support.
Healthy marriages or long-term committed relationships can give that
support.
Children do thrive better under stability, and I’d argue that two
parents can provide more support than one. This is not about bashing
single mothers because actually they’re the larger population of
contemporary Black parents. Many do just fine and will continue to raise
their children to be successful young men and women. In the same way, I
applaud single fathers, who are raising their children alone. I do not
want to forget them because I’m sure that they have some valid
contributions to this social conversation. Growing up under a single
parent absolutely is not a death sentence, even if it may bring a unique
set of challenges. There are other family members and community folks
who step up to the plate to create the necessary team for raising a
child. This support is imperative, not simply for single mothers, but
for married/committed parents challenged by other social issues.
Marriage and romantic commitment does not solely ensure a child’s
success. Let’s be sure to discuss what other support mechanisms our
community can bring to the table.
On the same-sex parenting side of things, homosexual couples have
proven that they can raise cohesive families without a marriage
certificate. Unfortunately, I would argue that a lot of this was not by
choice, but circumstance. Yet, they have done it and continue to do it,
proving that the marriage certificate is not a necessity for a
commitment to each other as parents and to their children.
I do believe that healthy marriages are powerful tools for building
strong, committed relationships enabling parents to feel supported by
each other and, thus, provide a stable household for children. I also
think that wedding ceremonies are a beautiful celebration, especially if
the marriages resulting from them transform into healthy unions. The
celebration and subsequent healthy marriage can set a strong example of
unity for the children in our community. Therefore, this is something
positive and admirable to be promoting.
Ultimately, we’ve got to reshape the state of Black relationships, in
addition to other social oppressions, if we’re going to set examples
for our kids and provide them with better opportunities. Admittedly,
healthy marriages are hard to come by, just like most non-marital
relationships are not long lasting. There needs to be a stronger, more
realistic conversation about what works to create stable, parental
environments. This is not about judgment, and it’s unnecessary to throw
darts at women who could be labeled as “baby mamas.” Not every woman is
going to have her child inside wedlock, and this is something we need to
acknowledge and factor into the conversation.
We may never go back to the days where weddings before kids were the
norm. It’s not the end of the world, but it is a social change that
needs to be dealt with in terms of how we become unified for our kids.
We could try to go back to the old way of doing things—or we can try to
come up with another solution. Regardless, we need to figure this out
for our children, personal health, and overall community’s strength.
Don’t simply critique, help come up with intersectional solutions for
our advancement. I don’t have all of the answers and perhaps you
disagree with my analysis. That’s quite okay. I’m just thankful to be a
facilitator of conversation and hope you’ll contribute your voice too.
1 comment:
Seriously, Why does keeping your legs closed have to be a movement....I mean really. I would never let a man impregnate me without the benefit of marriage and I never needed a movement to help me come to that decision.. sigh
Post a Comment