October
22nd, 2010, Fairfax, VA—Americans for Limited Government today praised
House Republican Leader John Boehner for calling for an end to taxpayer
funding of public broadcasting in the wake of National Public Radio
(NPR) firing news analyst Juan Williams.
In an interview with National Review Online, Boehner said,
“Washington is borrowing 37 cents of every dollar it spends from our
kids and grandkids. Given that, I think it’s reasonable to ask why
Congress is spending taxpayers’ money to support a left-wing radio
network — and in the wake of Juan Williams’ firing, it’s clearer than
ever that’s what NPR is.”
“We need to face facts — our government is broke,” Boehner added.
With a $13.6 trillion national debt, and the Obama Administration
proposing to raise it by approximately $1.06 trillion every year for
the next ten years, ALG’s Wilson is emphatic about getting the nation’s
balance sheet in order. He believes public broadcasting is the right
place to start.
“If Congress cannot cut public broadcasting when we must balance the
budget, it cannot cut anything,” Wilson said, adding, “John Boehner is
right. We are broke. The real reason behind QE2 is that the Treasury could be facing approximately a $630 billion shortfall in treasuries auctions every year for the next three years. If we can barely pay the bills as is, why are we borrowing and printing money to pay for luxuries like public broadcasting?”
Wilson called for “an immediate end to funding for public
broadcasting that has not already been disbursed” and renewed his call
for members of Congress to cosponsor legislation by Representative Doug Lamborn that would defund it permanently. Currently, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting receives about $420 million annually from taxpayers in the federal budget.
Wilson said that the Juan Williams firing “reveals the real, radical
agenda behind public broadcasting,” adding, “Williams’ discriminatory
firing is a perfect, perhaps prime reason why there shouldn't even be
public broadcasting. The government has demonstrated time and again
that it is an intolerant force with no ability nor willingness to
respect alternative viewpoints.” Wilson noted that Williams was fired
“merely for expressing his opinions.”
In an interview with FOX News’ Bill O’Reilly, Williams said
“when I get on a plane, I got to tell you, if I see people who are in
Muslim garb and I think, you know, they're identifying themselves first
and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous.”
Wilson noted that Williams “is entitled to his honest opinion. In
the same interview, his broader point was that you had to distinguish
between Muslims of faith and terrorists killing in the name of
religion. He was explaining in an honest way his own personal struggle
to overcome fear in the wake of the 9/11 attacks to make that point.
For that, he was fired.”
“Williams was not even on NPR when he said it. How could he violate their so-called ‘editorial guidelines’?” Wilson added. Writing for FOXNews.com, Williams called it
“a chilling assault on free speech. The critical importance of honest
journalism and a free flowing, respectful national conversation needs
to be had in our country. But it is being buried as collateral damage
in a war whose battles include political correctness and ideological
orthodoxy.”
Williams added, “I say an ideological battle because my comments on
‘The O’Reilly Factor’ are being distorted by the self-righteous
ideological, left-wing leadership at NPR.”
“NPR has engaged in blatant viewpoint discrimination,” Wilson
explained. “They are more like a limited public forum than an agency
with strict communications guidelines for who can speak for the agency,
because they are a public broadcaster. They are obligated under the
First Amendment to allow and tolerate alternative viewpoints. They
cannot fire somebody simply over a matter of personal opinion.”
Wilson said that Williams “could sue under the First Amendment for
discriminating on the basis of his viewpoint, but that may be besides
the point.”
Wilson concluded, “This is censorship of the first order by a public
agency. Given their track record, I’m not even going to pretend that
the Corporation for Public Broadcasting could ever be reformed to be
viewpoint neutral. They are a radical, ideological propaganda unit, and
Congress has a responsibility to cut off their funding. They are
discriminating against honest journalists, and taxpayers should not be
compelled to finance its ideological, one-sided political agenda.
Besides, we cannot afford it.”
Get permalink here.
No comments:
Post a Comment