It’s always sad, and more than a little embarrassing, when a security
site gets owned. But that’s what happened to PandaLabs yesterday
evening. AntiSec hit back in retaliation, it said, for PandaLabs’
involvement in the arrest of 25 Anonymous members reported on 28
February. The timing, and indeed the opening statement on AntiSec’s
defacement, suggests that it had just as much to do with the FBI
yesterday charging six LulzSec hackers, including Sabu (so-called leader
of LulzSec) over the Stratfor hack. Sabu had been arrested last summer,
but it was never officially announced. Yesterday it became clear that
he ‘pled guilty’ at the time – which pretty much confirms that he has
been acting as an informant for the FBI ever since.
Reports suggested that he turned President’s Evidence to minimize any
prison term away from his family – and any parent will recognize the
pressure. AntiSec’s opening statement on the PandaLabs’ defacement
accuses PandaLabs of ‘traison’ – “something we don’t forgive”. But then
it immediately goes on to say, “Yeah, yeah, we know… Sabu snitched on
us. As usually happens FBI menaced him to take his sons away. We
understand, but we were your family too (remember what you liked to
say?).”
So in one sense PandaLabs was chosen to make a statement to the
world: “We’re still here – expect us.”
However, AntiSec specifically accuses PandaLabs of helping “to jail
25 anonymous in different countries and they were actively participating
in our IRC channels trying to dox many others.” At the time, because
five of the 25 were arrested in Spain, I specifically asked Panda if it
had been involved. “This time, we were not involved on this case,” came a
very clear reply. I had earlier talked to Panda about its involvement
in the takedown of the Mariposa botnet. “We co-operate with the Spanish
police and some other institution on a regular basis,” he added, “but we
were not informed about it.”
AntiSec also makes it clear that it takes exception to PandaLabs’
technical director, Luis Corrons. It’s personal. He is quoted: “Really
good news. I have just read that LulzSec members have been arrested and
that their main head Sabu has been working as an informant for the FBI.
It turns out he was arrested last year, and since then he has been
working with Law Enforcement. As I said, really good news ” He is also quoted as saying “sometimes if
you want to infiltrate and you have to be one of the criminals, you
have to do things that you shouldn’t. In that case, you need to be with
law enforcement.” To be frank, neither of these statements sound like
the Luis Corrons I know – but time will unravel all.
Perhaps more worryingly, AntiSec also claims to have back-doored
Panda’s security products. Again, Panda is categoric: “Neither the main
website www.pandasecurity.com nor www.cloudantivirus.com were affected
in the attack. The attack did not breach Panda Security’s internal
network and neither source code, update servers nor customer data was
accessed. The only information accessed was related to marketing
campaigns such as landing pages and some obsolete credentials, including
supposed credentials for employees that have not been working at Panda
for over five years.”
The difficult thing, however, is to see the wider picture and to
determine what is really going on. Remember Luis comment: “you have to
do things that you shouldn’t.” Well, law enforcement has certainly been
doing that in recent years. There’s the German police spyware, and the
FBI’s very own CIPAV – and God know’s what that we haven’t heard about.
So let’s look at the last week. Twenty-five Anonymous arrests rapidly
followed by the disclosure that the Anonymous free DDoS tool (slowloris)
had been poisoned with the, frankly, most well-known and feared malware
of the day – Zeus – closely followed by charges against the main
figures in LulzSec. That reads like a campaign organized by a marketing
company to discredit Anonymous and sow seeds of distrust.
Read the DDoS-hacked announcement from Symantec here.
Make up your own mind, but to me it simply doesn’t hang together
properly. I’ve got a question mark there. Did the FBI poison slowloris?
Now go back the Stratfor hack (late December 2011). It happened after
Sabu became an informant, yet he is charged over it. Anonymous very
clearly denied any involvement, stating “Sabu and his crew are nothing
more than opportunistic attention whores who are possibly agent
provocateurs.” And yes, Anonymous knew that Sabu had been turned by the
FBI. But the wider and more worrying question is this: if Sabu was
already working for the FBI when LulzSec hacked Stratfor, does that mean
that Stratfor was sacrificed by the FBI on the altar of misinformation?
As Luis is quoted: “you have to do things that you shouldn’t.” But if
this is true, it’s going too far.
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
New 16-Year-Old Gymnast Shining Brighter than Champion
Summer Olympics is only five
months away and America’s team looks like they will prevail with the
same luster and strength as the past. We already have a world champion
on the American team, but there is new talent on the block upstaging her
and she is also American.
The new kid on the block is 16-year-old Gabby Douglas and she outshined everyone on her team as well as the others at the American Cup which was held at Madison Square Garden Saturday. The present world champion in gymnastics is Jordyn Wieber, but Douglas surpassed her in points. Unfortunately, her points didn’t count because she was competing as an alternate.
But, it is the hope that this performance, the Huffington Post called “near perfect,” will not be discounted when the team is completed and finalized for the Summer Olympics. She has shown the world that she is a true contender and more than qualified to be in the building. She told the Huffington Post:
-J.C. Brooks
The The new kid on the block is 16-year-old Gabby Douglas and she outshined everyone on her team as well as the others at the American Cup which was held at Madison Square Garden Saturday. The present world champion in gymnastics is Jordyn Wieber, but Douglas surpassed her in points. Unfortunately, her points didn’t count because she was competing as an alternate.
But, it is the hope that this performance, the Huffington Post called “near perfect,” will not be discounted when the team is completed and finalized for the Summer Olympics. She has shown the world that she is a true contender and more than qualified to be in the building. She told the Huffington Post:
“When we won the team title it made me more confident,” Douglas said. “I realized, `Wow, I’m one of the best ones in the world.’”The gymnastics world is excited about Gabby Douglas and so are we. Read more here on the Virginia Beach native who moved to Iowa to perfect her skills and follow her dream in gymnastics.
-J.C. Brooks
Mother Gets 5 Years for Son Attending Out of District School
Like her predecessor Kelly Williams Bolar, who we reported being jailed for falsifying documents to get her children into a school in a better district in Ohio, Tonya McDowell, 34, now faces five years in prison for the same offense. The McDowell case is a little different though because there were drug sells involved.
Bolar was incarcerated for 10 days and put on three years probation for the crime of trying to get her children a better education in Norwalk, Conn. instead of Bridgeport. McDowell has several other factors against her. She was homeless, using her babysitter’s address and selling dope. They threw the bookshelf at her. The actual sentence is for 12 years in prison, suspended after she serves five years and another five years probation, according to Your Black World.
Do you feel that there really should be a fundamental change in the zoning laws or do you believe they are right to send them to jail for this offense? Prison sentences are too much. In Bolar’s case, she was studying to be a teacher and now she cannot ever teach children because of this felony charge. Travesty or justice? Read more here.
-J.C. Brooks
Labels:
12 years,
bridgeport,
five years,
kelly williams bolar,
norwalk,
Prison,
school,
tonya mcdowell
It’s Official! Peyton Manning is Released from the Colts
quarterback position is the
coveted spot on the football team that everyone remembers for game
losses, the game wins, and the great mistakes. In this year’s Super
Bowl, one of two star brother quarterbacks made it into the game…one did
not. The other held back from the football season with an injury. But
after that injury has healed, the team has decided to let him go.
Eli and Peyton Manning represent the New York Giants and the Indianapolis Colts, respectively. Their father even played the game for a while, but now the Colts want to retire Peyton Manning. He’s shown that he’s ready to come back to the game, but they are going to announce today that he will be officially cut and not pay his $28 million roster bonus.
But don’t get pissed so quickly, Peyton will be a free agent and has been given the green light for a doctor to go back to the grid iron. He will be relentless when he is picked up by any team. He is a hot ticket that is being dissed for the new guy fresh out of Stanford, Andrew Luck. This is the choice of a new management that has taken over the Colts.
Peyton walks away a four-time MVP winner and there’s already talk that the Miami Dolphins are looking to pick him up. You had a good run Peyton. Good luck out there! Read more here.
-J.C. Brooks
The Eli and Peyton Manning represent the New York Giants and the Indianapolis Colts, respectively. Their father even played the game for a while, but now the Colts want to retire Peyton Manning. He’s shown that he’s ready to come back to the game, but they are going to announce today that he will be officially cut and not pay his $28 million roster bonus.
But don’t get pissed so quickly, Peyton will be a free agent and has been given the green light for a doctor to go back to the grid iron. He will be relentless when he is picked up by any team. He is a hot ticket that is being dissed for the new guy fresh out of Stanford, Andrew Luck. This is the choice of a new management that has taken over the Colts.
Peyton walks away a four-time MVP winner and there’s already talk that the Miami Dolphins are looking to pick him up. You had a good run Peyton. Good luck out there! Read more here.
-J.C. Brooks
Labels:
andrew luck,
colts,
mvp,
peyton manning,
quarterback,
stanford
Strangling Civil Liberties, One Twist at a Time
A Black Agenda Radio commentary by
Glen Ford
Got an urge to protest
the most obnoxious Republican presidential contenders, or demonstrate at
the NATO meeting, in Chicago? Consult your legal counsel, because the
rules have been changed, with no debate in either House of Congress.
Legislation awaiting the president’s signature packs prison terms for
protesting too closely to people guarded by the Secret Service or at a
National Security Event Zone.
Strangling
Civil Liberties, One Twist at a Time
A Black Agenda Radio commentary by
Glen Ford
“Anyone who is
caught ‘trespassing’ in the Zone, whether they knew it was restricted or
not, is liable for felony prosecution.”
There is a constituency
for the right to assemble and protest in this country, but it appears as
if that constituency has very little representation in the U.S.
Congress. The Senate unanimously passed a law that has significant
ramifications for the Occupy movement or anyone else that wants to
exercise their First Amendment rights. H.R. 347 is also known as the Trespass
Bill. Only three members of the House voted against it, all of them
Republicans, including presidential contender Ron Paul. None of the
major civil liberties organizations raised a fuss, either, but the
silence will surely come back to haunt us.
The bill makes it a
federal crime punishable by a year in prison for “trespassing” on places
where someone under protection of the Secret Service is also present,
and up to ten years if a weapon is involved, or someone is seriously
injured. The restrictions cover not just the president, but also
presidential candidates and foreign dignitaries and heads of state. The
new version of the law makes protesters subject to felony prosecution
even if they were unaware that people protected by the Secret Service
were in the area. Rather than demonstrators freely congregating to
protest the presence of their least favored presidential politicians, or
to loudly demand that visiting foreign leaders go back home, would-be
protesters would be best-advised by their lawyers to stay as far away as
possible or face a long stretch in prison. Surely, that stands the
right to peacefully assemble on its head.
“The only No
votes came from Tea Party Republicans.”
Even more ominously, the
new law allows the Department of Homeland Security to designate whole
areas as part of a so-called National Security Event Zone, off limits to
protest. The United National Anti-War Coalition and others that are
planning to demonstrate at the meeting of NATO nations, in Chicago, in
late May, will almost certainly be confronted with, not only Mayor Rahm
Emanuel’s aggressive protest containment policies, but a Homeland
Security declaration putting large areas under a federal protective
bubble, with even more serious criminal consequences. In the real, often
chaotic whirl of mass outdoor protest, with police pushing crowds from
place to place, and protesters trying to make themselves heard, large
numbers of demonstrators could find themselves in a federal no-go zone.
Under the old rules, the harshest penalties could be imposed only on
those who “willfully” crossed into a National Security Event Zone. The
new Trespass Bill omits the word “willfully,” so that anyone who is
caught “trespassing” in the Zone, whether they knew it was restricted or
not, is liable for felony prosecution. This brings to mind the mass
arrests of Occupy demonstrators on Brooklyn Bridge, last year. Many in
the crowd thought they were being escorted across the bridge by police,
and were not willfully trespassing. Under the federal bill, lack of
willfulness is no excuse.
What is more disturbing
than the potential Bill of Rights-eroding aspects of the legislation, is
the Congress’s cavalier attitude towards civil liberties. There was no
debate. The only No votes came from Tea Party Republicans. Democrats
behaved as if nothing important was happening, just as when President
Bill Clinton first came up with the idea National Security Event Zones –
where the public, by law, has nothing to say.
For Black Agenda Radio,
I’m Glen Ford. On the web, go to BlackAgendaReport.com.
New Data Show Black Students Have Been New Jim Crowed
by BAR executive editor Glen Ford
New data indicate that
Black stigmatization as criminals pervades the nation’s public schools,
just as it saturates the larger society. “For teachers and school
disciplinarians, just as with street cops and prosecutors, race is the
most important factor in who is charged with an offense, and how severe
the penalty is.” A doubling of school suspensions and expulsions has
occurred since the early Seventies, the same period that brought us mass
Black incarceration.
New
Data Show Black Students Have Been New Jim Crowed
by BAR executive editor Glen Ford
“More than 70
percent of students arrested or referred to law enforcement for school
related incidents were Black or Hispanic – an approximate match to the
ethnic composition of the nation’s prisons.”
Newly-released data on
the nation’s public schools document what every Black school kid already
knows: African American students are far more likely to be suspended or
expelled than whites. Most striking, is how closely school discipline
data tracks with racial incarceration numbers. According to the U.S.
Department of Education’s Civil Rights Data Collection statistics for the 2009-10
school year, more than 70 percent of students arrested or referred to
law enforcement for school related incidents were Black or Hispanic – an
approximate match to the ethnic composition of the nation’s prisons.
The school-to-prison
pipeline is a much talked about phenomenon, although volume should never
be mistaken for clarity. The apparent “tracking” of Blacks and, to a
lesser degree, Hispanics, from classrooms to cellblocks, is the direct
result of the behaviors of teachers and administrators who perceive and
treat Black kids as if they are already criminals – just as cops act on
the assumption that Black pedestrians and drivers are probably guilty
of…something.
The Department of
Education figures have only recently become available, and have yet to
be thoroughly sliced and diced. But the raw stats are damning. A Black
student is three and a half times more likely to be kicked out of school
than her white peer. Students with disabilities, who are
disproportionately kids of color, make up only 12 percent of enrollment,
but comprise 70 percent of those disciplined by being strapped down or
otherwise subjected to physical restraints.
“A Black
student is three and a half times more likely to be kicked out of school
than her white peer.”
The data show that
schools that maintain “zero-tolerance” policies are actually less racist
in meting out punishment than more free-wheeling systems. That’s
because the more rigid disciplinary school regimes give teachers and
administrators less discretion for lenience to white kids that
misbehave. For teachers and school disciplinarians, just as with street
cops and prosecutors, race is the most important factor in who is
charged with an offense, and how severe the penalty is.
There would be much more
federal information on public schools to study, if the racial data
collection had not been halted by the Bush administration in 2006. At
the time, Ward Connerly and other Republicans were busy trying to ban
governments from keeping information on race, on the theory that racism
would disappear as a point of controversy if there were no reliable data
to discuss. White privilege would also be relegated to anecdote.
An earlier study of
federal data by the Southern Poverty Law Center, published in 2010,
showed that suspension rates in U.S. public schools nearly doubled –
from 3.7 percent to 6.9 percent – from the early 1970s through 2006.
This is also the period when modern mass Black incarceration makes its
entrance, following the Black Freedom Movement of the Sixties. On both
the streets and school campuses, whites responded to the end of strict
apartheid with increased official repression. The New Jim Crow was
taking shape.
As reported by educator
and BAR contributor Sikivu Hutchinson, in August of last year, a study of Texas schools by the Council of State
Governments concluded that Black and Latino students “were disciplined
far more harshly than white students who had committed similar offenses”
– just as in the adult criminal justice system, where Blacks face
harsher penalties at every stage of the process, from arrest through
final charges through length and conditions of incarceration. White
students were much more likely to get counseling or on-site suspension
or detention, rather than kicked out of the building – just as so-called
“diversion” programs to keep offenders out of prison are
disproportionately awarded to whites.
“The
disparate discipline was rooted in negative teacher perceptions about
Black and Latino students, rather than the actual behavior of the
students.”
Black
students were more likely to be kicked out of class for making too much
noise, showing teachers disrespect, for loitering, or appearing to
present a “threat,” according to June, 2000, Indiana University study
titled “The Color of Discipline.”
The
Southern Poverty Law Center study concluding that “race and gender
disparities in suspension were due not to differences in administrative
disposition but to differences
in the rate of initial referral of black and white students.”
The
fault, said the Texas report, lay with teachers and administrators who
piled charges on the Black and Latino kids. The disparate discipline was
rooted in negative teacher perceptions about Black and Latino students,
rather than the actual behavior of the students.
In Los Angeles, such
race-based perceptions were shared by white, Black and brown faculty,
alike, according to a study of the school district. Sikivu Hutchinson reported that “South L.A.
schools with significant or majority black faculty and administrators
are just as culpable” as their non-white cross town colleagues in
disproportionately suspending Blacks – an internalized version of white
racism that is reflected on the streets and in the cellblocks where
Black cops and prison guards are just as brutal as their white
co-workers. When Black life is cheap, everybody behaves accordingly,
including Blacks.
Education Secretary Arne
Duncan says he hopes the report will be an “eye-opener.” Racism, of
course, is able to hide in plain sight because – well, because the
racists are the ones in charge. We cannot expect Mr. Duncan to see the
light, to propose a radical national program of community control of
schools and school budgets, or to call off the Obama administration’s
massive school charter privatization campaign. He will, therefore,
continue to systematically degrade the public schools so that charters
appear to be the only alternative. Duncan and his corporate masters are
able to pull off the destruction of American public education by placing
the dynamite in the inner cities, where Black children are already
stigmatized – New Jim Crowed! – as criminals.
The destructive web of government welfare
By Rebekah Rast
A hypothetical single mother of two lives in Virginia and brings home $20,000 a year after the government takes out Social Security and other state and federal deductions. However, because of her low income she is able to collect Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), food stamps, Medicaid/SCHIP and Section 8 housing.
In another scenario a recent college graduate is fortunate enough to find a job and makes a starting salary of $39,900.
Who makes more money — the single mother or the recent college graduate?
If you guessed the single mom, you’re right. With her income less taxes plus subsidies, she brings home just about $40,000, according to economist Clifford Thies.
When applying Thies research that the relationship of earned income and after-tax income plus subsidies is basically flat from $0 to $40,000, it paints a grim picture for today’s working class. During the fourth quarter of 2011 median weekly earnings for full time wage and salary workers in the U.S. was $764 — a yearly salary equal to $39,728. This means those who make this median amount or less essentially have less spending power than those who make a much lower salary and live off the government’s myriad welfare programs.
How can this be?
It’s simple really, when you consider that there are about 70 means-tested welfare spending programs overlapping in the U.S. today. These means-tested programs have nothing to do with Social Security, or other entitlement programs. Though they phase out as income increases, they keep people dependent on the government — even when they don’t want to be. They also discourage workers from moving up the ranks or from finding a job at all.
You see, someone making less than $40,000 a year might be penalized for accepting a raise or agreeing to work more hours because it might result in a much smaller personal budget. When low-income Americans move up in the tax code, they don’t just face a higher tax bracket, they also see their government benefits begin to disappear. Unfortunately for many, it economically makes more sense to stay at their current level and turn down that raise or extra hours of work.
This government trap ensures that the poor in America stay poor.
Get full story here.
A hypothetical single mother of two lives in Virginia and brings home $20,000 a year after the government takes out Social Security and other state and federal deductions. However, because of her low income she is able to collect Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), food stamps, Medicaid/SCHIP and Section 8 housing.
In another scenario a recent college graduate is fortunate enough to find a job and makes a starting salary of $39,900.
Who makes more money — the single mother or the recent college graduate?
If you guessed the single mom, you’re right. With her income less taxes plus subsidies, she brings home just about $40,000, according to economist Clifford Thies.
When applying Thies research that the relationship of earned income and after-tax income plus subsidies is basically flat from $0 to $40,000, it paints a grim picture for today’s working class. During the fourth quarter of 2011 median weekly earnings for full time wage and salary workers in the U.S. was $764 — a yearly salary equal to $39,728. This means those who make this median amount or less essentially have less spending power than those who make a much lower salary and live off the government’s myriad welfare programs.
How can this be?
It’s simple really, when you consider that there are about 70 means-tested welfare spending programs overlapping in the U.S. today. These means-tested programs have nothing to do with Social Security, or other entitlement programs. Though they phase out as income increases, they keep people dependent on the government — even when they don’t want to be. They also discourage workers from moving up the ranks or from finding a job at all.
You see, someone making less than $40,000 a year might be penalized for accepting a raise or agreeing to work more hours because it might result in a much smaller personal budget. When low-income Americans move up in the tax code, they don’t just face a higher tax bracket, they also see their government benefits begin to disappear. Unfortunately for many, it economically makes more sense to stay at their current level and turn down that raise or extra hours of work.
This government trap ensures that the poor in America stay poor.
Get full story here.
Obama attempts to distract from Super Tuesday with a puppet show
By Rebecca DiFede
Is Obama smarter than a fifth grader? If you saw his less-than-impressive nationally televised press conference (his first in five months), you might not think so.
At 1:15pm yesterday, with a nation on baited breath, our illustrious president took the stage in the Brady Press Briefing Room. And for the next forty-five minutes he proceeded to say…
Nothing.
Hardly anything of substance was uttered for the entirely of the affair. It was actually kind of boring. It was as if Obama was a lost tourist and native people were asking him how to get to the nearest McDonalds.
It was as if, in an attempt to avoid scorn from Republicans for possibly making a mistake, our Commander in Chief stumbled his way through a nearly indistinguishable series of “buts” “ums” and “uhs” in response to the barely sophomoric questions posed to him by the press.
His questions wouldn’t give a kindergartener a second thought, and yet he reacted like Forrest Gump in a police interrogation. He seemed confused by the mere fact that spoken words were being uttered in his direction, and his inability to speak a cohesive sentence was Muppet-level ridiculous.
Guess he’s not so smooth without his trusty teleprompter. His hands were practically shaking with withdrawal.
This hilariously unscripted conference was supposed to show that the President was taking an initiative to be held accountable for his actions and promises, and hopefully be asked some questions that would require, oh, I don’t know, a complete rational thought.
Hard questions that Americans want answers to such as “what is your response to calls for the resignations of your recess appointees?” or “what are your plans regarding new forms of energy in light of the bankruptcies of taxpayer-subsidized green energy companies like Solyndra and Ener1?” were dropped, in favor of vague softball questions lightly tossed in his direction.
The rage and despair Americans are experiencing in this economy was glazed over like a bump in the road to re-securing the White House. Instead, he was asked several similarly worded questions about Israel and their possible war with Iran, a quick Super Tuesday plug where all Obama did was sarcastically wish Romney luck, and a few other assorted time wasters.
And when he was finally asked a question centered on gas prices, he danced around the issue like an out-of-time vaudeville performer.
Get full story here.
Is Obama smarter than a fifth grader? If you saw his less-than-impressive nationally televised press conference (his first in five months), you might not think so.
At 1:15pm yesterday, with a nation on baited breath, our illustrious president took the stage in the Brady Press Briefing Room. And for the next forty-five minutes he proceeded to say…
Nothing.
Hardly anything of substance was uttered for the entirely of the affair. It was actually kind of boring. It was as if Obama was a lost tourist and native people were asking him how to get to the nearest McDonalds.
It was as if, in an attempt to avoid scorn from Republicans for possibly making a mistake, our Commander in Chief stumbled his way through a nearly indistinguishable series of “buts” “ums” and “uhs” in response to the barely sophomoric questions posed to him by the press.
His questions wouldn’t give a kindergartener a second thought, and yet he reacted like Forrest Gump in a police interrogation. He seemed confused by the mere fact that spoken words were being uttered in his direction, and his inability to speak a cohesive sentence was Muppet-level ridiculous.
Guess he’s not so smooth without his trusty teleprompter. His hands were practically shaking with withdrawal.
This hilariously unscripted conference was supposed to show that the President was taking an initiative to be held accountable for his actions and promises, and hopefully be asked some questions that would require, oh, I don’t know, a complete rational thought.
Hard questions that Americans want answers to such as “what is your response to calls for the resignations of your recess appointees?” or “what are your plans regarding new forms of energy in light of the bankruptcies of taxpayer-subsidized green energy companies like Solyndra and Ener1?” were dropped, in favor of vague softball questions lightly tossed in his direction.
The rage and despair Americans are experiencing in this economy was glazed over like a bump in the road to re-securing the White House. Instead, he was asked several similarly worded questions about Israel and their possible war with Iran, a quick Super Tuesday plug where all Obama did was sarcastically wish Romney luck, and a few other assorted time wasters.
And when he was finally asked a question centered on gas prices, he danced around the issue like an out-of-time vaudeville performer.
Get full story here.
Green Pressure Groups Poised to Shut Down Production Even if Keystone Pipeline is Approved
By Kevin Mooney
Even if the Obama Administration reverses course on the Keystone XL pipeline prior to the November elections, there are any number of green pressure groups in circulation that could complicate production efforts. President Obama recently denied the pipeline’s application to cross between the Canadian-U.S. border. The pipeline itself would extend from Canada to Texas.
Transcanada, the Canadian firm behind the project, has announced that will move forward with plans to construct the portion of the pipe running from Cushing, Okla., to Port Arthur, Texas. TransCanada has also made it clear that will continue to apply for a federal grant from the U.S. to allow for the section that would cut across the U.S. and Canada. The company should expect to encounter stiff opposition. The overriding purpose of the pipeline is to transport oil from the tar sands in Canada to the Gulf Coast refineries.
With America’s military fighting terrorists in politically unstable and faraway regions of the world and rogue states like Iran and North Korea building their nuclear arsenals, the benefits here of having a safe, secure and reliable source of oil close to home should be evident.
Green groups are working to turn public opinion in the U.S. and Canada against the production of crude oil extracted from the oil sands in Alberta, Canada. And they are succeeding.
Bill Wilson, President of Americans for Limited Government noted, “It is absurd that Obama and his allies seemingly put every interest above our national security interest.”
The Alberta oil sands (also known as tar sands) occupy an area in the middle of western Canada that is roughly the size of Florida. The oil sands are ideally positioned to meet America’s growing energy needs. Yet green groups, often tiny but determined, have mobilized protests on the state and local levels using pressure tactics that are highly personal and, hence, effective. Their goal is to compel changes in corporate decision-making, sway public opinion, and influence government policies. The groups often coordinate their efforts with the big national and international environmental organizations, but they are careful to maintain their independence which guarantees their freedom of action.
Advocates for the West, for instance, based in Boise, Idaho, has attracted little media attention. But it has proven itself to be a powerful adversary of Alberta oil producers. The group has adopted a shrewd and carefully calibrated legal strategy that has prevented such oil giants as ConocoPhillips and Imperial Oil (an Exxon Mobil affiliate) from sending truckloads of heavy equipment through Idaho and Montana and into Alberta where it will be used to extract crude oil from the oil sands.
Get full story here.
Even if the Obama Administration reverses course on the Keystone XL pipeline prior to the November elections, there are any number of green pressure groups in circulation that could complicate production efforts. President Obama recently denied the pipeline’s application to cross between the Canadian-U.S. border. The pipeline itself would extend from Canada to Texas.
Transcanada, the Canadian firm behind the project, has announced that will move forward with plans to construct the portion of the pipe running from Cushing, Okla., to Port Arthur, Texas. TransCanada has also made it clear that will continue to apply for a federal grant from the U.S. to allow for the section that would cut across the U.S. and Canada. The company should expect to encounter stiff opposition. The overriding purpose of the pipeline is to transport oil from the tar sands in Canada to the Gulf Coast refineries.
With America’s military fighting terrorists in politically unstable and faraway regions of the world and rogue states like Iran and North Korea building their nuclear arsenals, the benefits here of having a safe, secure and reliable source of oil close to home should be evident.
Green groups are working to turn public opinion in the U.S. and Canada against the production of crude oil extracted from the oil sands in Alberta, Canada. And they are succeeding.
Bill Wilson, President of Americans for Limited Government noted, “It is absurd that Obama and his allies seemingly put every interest above our national security interest.”
The Alberta oil sands (also known as tar sands) occupy an area in the middle of western Canada that is roughly the size of Florida. The oil sands are ideally positioned to meet America’s growing energy needs. Yet green groups, often tiny but determined, have mobilized protests on the state and local levels using pressure tactics that are highly personal and, hence, effective. Their goal is to compel changes in corporate decision-making, sway public opinion, and influence government policies. The groups often coordinate their efforts with the big national and international environmental organizations, but they are careful to maintain their independence which guarantees their freedom of action.
Advocates for the West, for instance, based in Boise, Idaho, has attracted little media attention. But it has proven itself to be a powerful adversary of Alberta oil producers. The group has adopted a shrewd and carefully calibrated legal strategy that has prevented such oil giants as ConocoPhillips and Imperial Oil (an Exxon Mobil affiliate) from sending truckloads of heavy equipment through Idaho and Montana and into Alberta where it will be used to extract crude oil from the oil sands.
Get full story here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)