Today’s pop music is filled with
symbols and messages aimed to shape and mold today’s youth. Apart from
the occult symbolism discussed in other articles, other parts of the
elite’s agenda are communicated through music videos. Two of those parts
are transhumanism and the introduction of a police state. We’ll look
at the way those agendas are part of the acts of Rihanna, Beyonce,
Daddy Yankee and the Black Eyed Peas.
As
seen in previous articles on this site, the world’s biggest stars
exploit common themes in their work, permeating popular culture with a
set of symbols and values. The cohesiveness of the message that is
communicated to the masses, regardless of the artists’ musical genre,
attests to the influence of a “higher power” over the industry. Other
articles on this site have explored the way Illuminati symbolism, based
on secret society occultism, has been reflected in popular videos.
Exposing and desensitizing the world to the elite’s sacred symbols is,
however, only one aspect of their agenda. Other aspects of Illuminati
control are reflected in today’s popular music as well, including: mass
mind control, transhumanism (the “robotization” of the human body) and
the gradual introduction of a virtual police state. Through the news,
movies and the music industry, this agenda is being insidiously
presented to the masses, using various techniques. If the news scares
people into accepting measures diminishing their personal freedoms and
ushering in a “new era”, the music business accomplishes the same job
by making it seem sexy, cool and trendy. This angle is mainly aimed at
the younger crowd, which is much more susceptible to “take in” the
industry’s message.
Essential Information
If you’ve never heard of transhumanism or martial law, I suggest you visit the
“Educate Yourself” section first, as I will only provide a very summary explanation of each concept here.
Transhumanism
- Image from humanityplus.org
“Transhumanism
is an international intellectual and cultural movement supporting the
use of science and technology to improve human mental and physical
characteristics and capacities. The movement regards aspects of the
human condition, such as disability, suffering, disease, aging, and
involuntary death as unnecessary and undesirable. Transhumanists look
to biotechnologies and other emerging technologies for these purposes.
Dangers, as well as benefits, are also of concern to the transhumanist
movement.
The term “transhumanism” is symbolized by H+ or h+ and is often
used as a synonym for “human enhancement”. Although the first known use
of the term dates from 1957, the contemporary meaning is a product of
the 1980s when futurists in the United States began to organize what has
since grown into the transhumanist movement. Transhumanist thinkers
predict that human beings may eventually be able to transform themselves
into beings with such greatly expanded abilities as to merit the label
“posthuman”. Transhumanism is therefore sometimes referred to as
“posthumanism” or a form of transformational activism influenced by
posthumanist ideals.
The transhumanist vision of a transformed future humanity has
attracted many supporters and detractors from a wide range of
perspectives. Transhumanism has been described by one critic, Francis
Fukuyama, as the world’s most dangerous idea,while one proponent, Ronald
Bailey, counters that it is the “movement that epitomizes the most
daring, courageous, imaginative, and idealistic aspirations of
humanity”.
What is almost never mentioned is the fact
that those technological “improvements” will be out of reach for the
average man. The huge price tags of those scientific discoveries will
render them only accessible to a select elite. While the common man is
forced to seek nourishment in genetically modified, chemically altered
and even poisonous foods, the elite is trying to achieve immortality
through science. Even if the masses cannot have access to those
discoveries, mass media makes transhumanism cool, desirable and,
ultimately, acceptable.
- Cover of H+, a transhumanist magazine. The headline says it all.
Police State
George W. Bush’s
Patriot Act
has enabled the American government to expand surveillance of its
citizens, whether it be phone calls, e-mails and physical movements. It
also gave the government almost unlimited powers of arrest, detention,
search and seizure. Donald E. Wilkes, Professor of Law at the
University of Georgia School of Law describes this last concept:
“I want to examine here a single section of the USA
Patriot Act–section 213, definitely one of the most sinister provisions
of this monstrous statute.
In euphemistic language that conceals the provision’s momentous
significance, section 213 states that with regard to federal search
warrants “any notice required … to be given may be delayed if … [1]the
court finds reasonable cause to believe that providing immediate
notification of the execution of the warrant may have an adverse result
…; [2] the warrant prohibits the seizure of any
tangible property … except where the court finds reasonable necessity
for the seizure; and [3] the warrant provides for the giving of such
notice within a reasonable period of its execution, which period may
thereafter be extended by the court for good cause shown.”
Section 213 may be couched in Orwellian terminology, but there is no doubt about what it does.
Section 213 is the first statute ever enacted in the history of
American criminal procedure to specifically authorize an entirely new
form of search warrant-what legal scholars call the sneak and peek
warrant (also dubbed the covert entry warrant or the surreptitious entry
warrant). A sneak and peek search warrant authorizes police to effect
physical entry into private premises without the owner’s or the
occupant’s permission or knowledge to conduct a search; generally, such
entry requires a breaking and entering.”
- Donald E. Wilkes, Flagpole Magazine Sept 2002.
Subsequent
acts have further diminished civil liberties of citizens by enabling
the government to declare any American a “terrorist” with little to no
proof. The government can also declare martial law with little or no
valid reason.
“The John W. Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2006,
“named for the longtime Armed Services Committee chairman from
Virginia,” was signed October 17, 2006, by President George W. Bush. The
Act “has a provocative provision called ‘Use of the Armed Forces in
Major Public Emergencies’,” the thrust of which “seems to be about
giving the federal government a far stronger hand in coordinating
responses to [Hurricane] Katrina-like disasters,” Jeff Stein, CQ
National Security Editor wrote December 1, 2006.
“But on closer inspection, its language also alters the
two-centuries-old Insurrection Act, which Congress passed in 1807 to
limit the president’s power to deploy troops within the United States …
‘to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful
combination, or conspiracy’,” Stein wrote.
“But the amended law takes the cuffs off” and “critics say it’s a
formula for executive branch mischief,” Stein wrote, as “the new
language adds ‘natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public
health emergency, terrorist attack or incident’ to the list of
conditions permitting the President to take over local authority —
particularly ‘if domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that
the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of
maintaining public order.’”
“One of the few to complain, Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt., warned
that the measure virtually invites the White House to declare federal
martial law. … It ‘subverts solid, longstanding posse comitatus statutes
that limit the military’s involvement in law enforcement, thereby
making it easier for the President to declare martial law,’ he said in
remarks submitted to the Congressional Record on Sept. 29.”
- Source
Posted by
Good will prevai
