Kathleen Parker went on and on about Sarah
Palin. So did every one else. Aaron Sorkin, praised by Spitzer and
Parker for his fine writing, said: “Sarah Palin is an idiot.” If that
passes for political discourse, include me out.
Palin was discussed in all four segments of
the show, perhaps in an effort to gin up controversy in the cable news
version of Google bombing. Odd that Barack Obama was barely mentioned.
Isn’t he, like, the president or something?
The show is an attempt to re-brand CNN as a
middle-of-the-road network that shows both sides of the political
spectrum.
The problem is neither Parker nor Spitzer
is a very good representative of their side. Parker’s Oogedy Boogedy
column after the 2008 election was a body blow to me and perhaps other
fans of her. Many conservatives likely will not forget her mocking their
religion.
As for Spitzer, he’s an ego-driven
prosecutor who climbed on the backs of many people who really did not
deserve to be prosecuted.
Also his call right off the bat — out of
the blue — to fire a man seemed intemperate.
The inner prosecutor in Spitzer showed when
he took a cheap shot at Andrew Breitbart by giving him 30 seconds to
explain the Shirley Sherrod case at the end of a segment that had
nothing to do with Mrs. Sherrod.
While there is a chemistry between them,
neither one seemed to take charge and conversations became a bunch of
chattering over one another. It seems unfair to put two people who have
no broadcast experience into the fray against the real professionals on
Fox News and MSNBC. You don’t have to like them to appreciate that Bill
O’Reilly and Keith Olbermann put in their time to learn their craft.
I wish Parker/Spitzer luck. But the show
gave me a headache. Too much talking over one another and too little
focus on something other than Sarah Palin. Maybe it will improve later
when I give it a second look in a few weeks.
No comments:
Post a Comment